The unhighlighted sentence further twists the already problematic resiliency line. One thing to use it on natural calamities (weather-weather lang) and quite another to apply it on a collective choice.
—
Setting us up for a wager. But why place your bets when the answer to “moral courage” is NO? The tax charges in billions, the party-list system as venue for his nepotistic network, his discriminatory gender stance, the hypocrisy of his Sotto-type religiosity in support of the death penalty, his support for an openly murderous regime—why should we have to elect him and then see if he is moral?
Immoral to propose the presidency as some amateur-night ethics contest. Much more so for someone already evidently corrupt.
—
Nobel, ma belle
Sont des mots qui vont très bien ensemble
Très bien ensemble
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento